Jeanette S. Riggins

Jeanette S. Riggins Partner

P 504 535 2880 F 504 535 2886
One Canal Place
365 Canal Street, Suite 3000
New Orleans, LA 70130
One Canal Place, 365 Canal Street, Suite 3000, New Orleans, LA 70130
Overview
Jeanette Riggins is a trial attorney with a wealth of experience. In addition to serving as the partner-in-charge of MG+M’s New Orleans and Mississippi offices, she currently serves on the National Trial Team for multiple clients and regularly appears in state and federal courts in various states. Beyond this work, Jeanette is also National Coordinating Counsel, as well as regional counsel for several of the firm’s clients, managing and supervising local counsel in defense of the companies. Her practice primarily focuses on toxic tort, products liability, general insurance defense, and premises liability. Jeanette has defended an extensive array of clients including product manufacturers, suppliers, contractors, employers, premise defendants, executive officers, and insurance companies.
Bar Admissions
  • Louisiana
  • Mississippi
  • U.S. District Court - Eastern District of Louisiana
  • U.S. District Court -
    Middle District of Louisiana
  • U.S. Court of Appeals -
    5th Circuit
  • Texas
  • U.S. District Court - Western District of Louisiana
  • U.S. District Court - Eastern District of Pennsylvania
  • U.S. District Court - Southern District of Texas
Education
  • Tulane University School of Law, J.D., 2000
  • Louisiana State University, B.A., 1997

Jeanette earned her J.D. from Tulane University School of Law in 2000. While in law school, she was a member of the Tulane Moot Court Board, and winner of the 2000 Phelps Dunbar Senior Trial Competition. Upon graduation, she served as a law clerk to the honorable J. Sterling Snowdy, Madeline Jasmine, and Mary Becnel of the 40th Judicial District Court, State of Louisiana.

Jeanette is admitted to practice law in Texas, Louisiana, and Mississippi, as well as before the United States District Courts for all Districts of Louisiana, the Southern District of Texas, the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, and the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit.

In addition to being a member of the bar associations for all states in which she is admitted to practice, Jeanette is a member of the Houston Bar Association, the Houston Lawyers Association, the Houston Volunteer Lawyers Association, and the Defense Research Institute. She is also a member of the distinguished Trial Advocacy faculty at Louisiana State University.

Trial Experience

Over the past decade, Jeanette has served as trial counsel for a number of clients, including contractors, suppliers, and manufacturers in asbestos lawsuits across the country.

Recently, Jeanette and her trial partner won a motion for a directed verdict for the defense in an asbestos trial in Baltimore City Circuit Court by focusing at trial on the plaintiff’s assumption of risk, a novel legal tactic in Maryland asbestos litigation.

Shortly thereafter, Jeanette also won a motion for summary judgment on behalf of a mechanical contractor client in an Orleans Parish, Louisiana asbestos lung cancer lawsuit. Plaintiff’s counsel alleged that the plaintiff had been exposed to asbestos from various products as a result of working around pipefitters employed by the Defendant contractor. At the close of discovery, Ms. Riggins moved for summary judgment on behalf of her client. Ms. Riggins outlined for the court that summary judgment was warranted, because the defendant contractor’s work at the plaintiff’s worksite involved only the installation of new piping. Importantly, the plaintiff admitted at his deposition that he did not know if the defendant engaged in any activity that exposed him to asbestos and further acknowledged that he was only "guessing" as to whether the defendant contractor was even at the specific worksite where he claimed asbestos exposure. Finally, Ms. Riggins argued that even if defendant performed work at the worksite in question during the same time period that the plaintiff worked there, the mere presence of Defendant at the facility was not sufficient evidence to establish that defendant’s activities exposed the plaintiff to asbestos, and was therefore not sufficient to defeat summary judgment. The court, after considering the oral argument and briefs of both parties, granted the defendant’s motion for summary judgment, finding that the plaintiff's counsel did not present evidence sufficient to establish that he will be able to satisfy his burden of proof at trial that the defendant’s activities were a substantial factor to the plaintiff’s development of lung cancer.

Recognition

Involvement

  • Member of MG+M Diversity & Inclusion Committee
  • Member of MG+M Women's Forum
  • LSU Trial Advocacy Faculty
  • 2018 American Bar Association National Mock Trial Competition Judge (final round)
  • Houston Bar Association
  • Houston Lawyers Association
  • Houston Volunteer Lawyers Project
  • Louisiana Bar Association
  • Mississippi Bar Association
  • Defense Research Institute

News & Insights

Speaking Engagements

  • Speaker, 2016 Perrin Conferences’ Cutting-Edge Issues in Asbestos Litigation Conference, “Friction Science: Fact, Fiction and Disparate Use of Science,” Beverly Hills, CA, March 14-15, 2016
  • Speaker, 2016, Perrin Conference's National Asbestos Litigation Conference, "Talc Mock Trial Exercise: Opening Arguments & Live Jury," San Francisco, CA, September 12-14, 2016
  • Speaker, 2014, Houston Bar Association, Medicare Secondary Payer Act, MMSEA Reporting Requirements

News